Official 200-Marks Evaluation Scheme across 7th and 8th Semesters: Proposal Defense, Progress Presentation, Prototype Demo, Thesis Report, and Viva Voce.
| S.No | Evaluation Milestone | Target Semester | Evaluators | Total Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial Proposal Defense | 7th Semester | FYP Committee | 40 Marks (20%) |
| 2 | Progress Presentation | 8th Semester | FYP Committee (40) Supervisor (20) | 60 Marks (30%) |
| 3 | Final Defense & Thesis | 8th Semester | Committee (50) External (25) Supervisor (25) | 100 Marks (50%) |
| TOTAL FYP WEIGHTAGE: | 200 Marks (100%) | |||
| Criteria | Rubric Expectation | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Idea & Originality | Originality of concept, problem novelty, and alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). | 10 |
| Presentation & Scope | Identifies system requirements, analyzes technical & design constraints, and establishes well-defined deliverables. | 30 |
| Criteria | Rubric Expectation | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| System Design | Proposes a feasible architecture, ER diagrams, data pipelines, methodology, or system architecture. | 10 |
| Prototype Implementation | Applies domain-specific technical frameworks effectively and demonstrates a working prototype of key modules. | 30 |
| Supervision Regularity | Clearly communicates weekly progress, meets milestones, incorporates supervisor feedback. | 20 |
| Component | Evaluator & Evaluation Focus | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| External / Demo | Live working demonstration of complete system, modern tools, technical robustness, handling edge cases. | 25 |
| Thesis Report | Academic writing, format compliance, comprehensive literature review, architecture diagrams, ethics & plagiarism clearance. | 25 |
| Presentation / Viva | Explains technical decisions with clarity and confidence, defense of theoretical foundations, handling Q&A. | 25 |
| Supervisor Assessment | Individual student contribution, team coherence, project management, and final code delivery. | 25 |